“The Machines Are Trading. But Who’s Still Thinking?”

At a gathering of bright young minds from the region’s top universities, Joseph Plazo—AI investor and founder of Plazo Sullivan Roche Capital—offered not hype, but hesitation.

In a city speeding toward fintech supremacy — the atmosphere inside AIM’s lecture hall was not electric, but charged—with thought.

Plazo, a man whose trading systems are trusted by institutional investors across continents and have posted a 99% win rate, did not arrive to dazzle.

“Speed is nothing without direction.”

???? **The Code Breaker Who Stopped to Ask Why**

This is no abstract philosophy. It’s professional reflection. He built the bots that move the markets.

Which makes his unease all the more compelling.

“What machines optimise, humans must justify.”

He referenced an early pandemic incident: an AI under his firm flagged a short trade on gold—right before central bank intervention reversed market expectations.

“We stopped it. The model was technically sound—but contextually catastrophic.”

???? **The Case for Slowness in a Market That Won’t Wait**

Plazo warned against the growing cultural obsession with speed—particularly in finance.

“Friction slows execution, but gives space for reflection.”

He introduced a three-question model he calls **Conviction Calculus**—a checklist not for technical performance, but for ethical clarity:

- What does this say about who we are?
- Is this merely a technical click here position—or a real-world one?
- Are we prepared to own this trade, even if it fails?

???? **The Human Cost of High-Speed Finance**

Markets in Singapore, South Korea, and the Philippines are being reshaped by code.

Plazo asked a harder question: “The software is evolving—but is the oversight?”

In 2024, two Hong Kong hedge funds collapsed after AI-driven trades missed geopolitical shifts.

“We created tools that don’t know how to say no.”

???? **Beyond the Bot: Plazo’s Push for Narrative AI**

Plazo isn’t calling for a retreat from technology.

He is instead building what he terms **“narrative-integrated AI”**—systems that assess not just numbers, but context, tone, and geopolitical undercurrents.

“AI should be a compass—not a cannon.”

Investors weren’t just curious—they were concerned.

One called the model:

“What regulation failed to build, this framework might.”

???? **The Next Market Failure May Begin With a Perfectly Executed Mistake**

Plazo closed with a sentence that now circles boardrooms like a quiet echo:

“It won’t be noise that breaks us. It’ll be silence.”

It wasn’t an attack on AI—it was an appeal to remain human.

Because we built the machines. But we still write the stories.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Comments on ““The Machines Are Trading. But Who’s Still Thinking?””

Leave a Reply

Gravatar